The Cognitive Trio: Backward Design, Formative Assessment, and Differentiated Instruction
Keywords:
backward design, formative assessment, differentiated instructionAbstract
In a traditional classroom of mixed ability levels, it is recommended that differentiation is the answer to helping all students achieve success (Heacox, 2012). This necessitates a shift from a “one size fits all” approach to one of greater emphasis on the individual in the learning process. While teachers seek ways to look at teaching, assessing, and learning through this different lens, the issue of successfully implementing differentiated instruction (DI) in the classroom continues to be challenging. This issue will be discussed with a focus on blending two major elements, backward design and formative assessment, as essential components in supporting and incorporating differentiated instruction in classrooms with mixed ability levels.
References
Bahr, D. L., & DeGarcia, L. A. (2008). Elementary mathematics is anything but elementary: Content and methods from a developmental perspective. Cengage Learning.
Bartz, D. E. (2017). Fundamentals of formative assessment for classroom teachers. In National Forum of Teacher Education Journal (Vol. 3, p. 27).
Battelle for Kids. (2019). Framework for 21st Century Learning. Retrieved from https://www.battelleforkids.org/networks/p21/frameworks-resources.
Bloom, B. S., & Carroll, J. B. (1971). Mastery learning: Theory and practice. J. H. Block (Ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Brookhart, S. M., & Nitko, A. J. (2014). Educational assessment of students. Pearson Higher Ed.
Brookhart, S. M., & Nitko, A. J. (2015). Providing formative feedback. Educational assessment of students (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Chapman, C., & King, R. (2005). Differentiated assessment strategies: One tool doesn't fit all. Corwin Press.
Chappuis, S., & Chappuis, J. (2008). The Best Value in Formative Assessment. Educational Leadership, 65(4), 14-19.
Chappuis, S., Chappuis, J. & Stiggins, R. (2009).The Quest for Quality. Educational Leadership 67(3), 14-19.
Conderman, G., & Hedin, L. (2012). Classroom assessments that inform instruction. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 48(4), 162-168.
Covey, S. (1989). The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. Habit 2. New York, Simon and Schuster.
Daugherty, K. D. (2006). Backward course design: Marking the end the beginning. American Journal of Pharmacy Education, 70(6), 1-5.
Davis, T. (2013). Differentiation of Instruction in Regular Education Elementary Classes: An Investigation of Faculty and Educational Leaders’ Perceptions of Differentiated Instruction in Meeting the Needs of Diverse Learner. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (Accession Order No.10070)
Emory, J. (2014). Understanding backward design to strengthen curricular models. Nurse Educator, 39(3), 122-125.
Fink, L. D. (2013). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. John Wiley & Sons.
Gregory, G. H., & Kuzmich, L. (2004). Data driven differentiation in the standards-based classroom. Corwin Press.
Guskey, T. R., & McTighe, J. (2016). Pre-assessment: Promises and cautions. Educational Leadership, 73(7), 38.
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.
Heacox, D. (2012). Differentiating instruction in the regular classroom: How to reach and teach all learners (Updated anniversary edition). Free Spirit Publishing.
McMillan, J. H. (2007). Classroom assessment: Principles and practice for effective standards-based instruction. Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
McTighe, J., & Wiggins, G. (2012). Understanding by design framework. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Popham, W. J. (2014). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know. Boston, MA: Pearson.
Popham, W. J. (2011). Transformative assessment in action: An inside look at applying the process. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Popham, W. J. (2008). Transformative Assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Stiggins, R., Arter, J., Chappuis, J., & Chappuis, S. (2006). Classroom assessment for student learning—Doing it right, using it well. Portland, OR: Educational Testing Service.
Stiggins, R. & DuFour, R. (2009). Maximizing the Power of Formative Assessments. The Phi Delta Kappan, 90(9), 640.
Stiggins, R. & Guskey, T. (2007). Assessment for learning: An essential foundation of productive instruction. In S. Reeves [Ed.]. Ahead of the curve: The power of assessment to transform teaching and learning. Bloomington, Indiana: Solution Tree.
Taylor, B. K. (2015). Content, process, and product: Modeling differentiated instruction. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 51(1), 13-17.
Thousand, J. S., Villa, R. A., & Nevin, A. I. (2007). Differentiating instruction: Collaborative planning and teaching for universally designed learning. Corwin Press.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate in mixed-ability classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
Tomlinson, C. (2014). The bridge between today’s lesson and tomorrow’s. Educational Leadership, 71(6), 10-14.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2015). Teaching for excellence in academically diverse classrooms. Society, 52(3), 203-209.
Tomlinson, C. A., & Imbeau, M. B. (2010). Leading and managing a differentiated classroom. ASCD.
Tomlinson, C. A., & McTighe, J. (2006). Integrating differentiated instruction & understanding by design: Connecting content and kids. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Vatterott, C. (2015). Rethinking Grading: Meaningful Assessment for Standards-Based Learning. Alexandria: VA. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
West, A., Swanson, J., & Lipscomb, L. (2017). Ch. 11 Scaffolding. Instructional Methods, Strategies and Technologies to Meet the Needs of All Learners.
Whipple, K. A. (2012). Differentiated instruction: A survey study of teacher understanding and
implementation in a southeast Massachusetts school district (Doctoral dissertation, Northeastern University).
Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Research Issues in Contemporary Education (RICE) is a nationally indexed, double-blind, peer-reviewed online journal that publishes educational research studies, literature reviews, theoretical manuscripts, and practitioner-oriented articles regarding issues in education. Views expressed in all published articles are the views of the author(s), and publication in RICE does not constitute endorsement. Submission of an article implies that it has not been published and is not currently under review for publication elsewhere.
RICE is an online journal available in the public domain, and use of its content is protected by a Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. This license provides authors with an assurance that LERA values their rights to their scholarly works and has adopted this license to restrict use of RICE content without appropriate permission and attribution.