Exploring the Dynamics of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education
Keywords:
higher education, artificial intelligence, teaching and learningAbstract
This position paper explored the current state of artificial intelligence (AI) tools, educator support and opposition to AI tools in teaching and learning, and the ethical and social implications of AI tools in higher education. As technology emerges in the educational community, educators must have a voice in how AI looks in the classroom. This paper addresses support and opposition to a need for more studies on student experiences with AI tools, such as personalized learning platforms and intelligent tutoring systems. Educational technology has acknowledged that social and ethical implications exist. However, this position paper acknowledges the need for being inclusive in framing technology and AI tools across less developed countries, emerging economies, and developed countries. This inclusion of diverse experiences impacts how AI perceives and generates new content. The practical applications of AI in future studies should explore how best to implement AI tools while advancing knowledge and maintaining academic integrity in becoming more technologically literate citizens.
References
Ark, T. V. (2017). Ask about AI: The future of work and learning. Getting Smart. https://www.gettingsmart.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Ask-About-AI-The-Future-of-Work-and-Learning-1.pdf
Batchelor, J. & Petersen, N. (2019). Preservice student views of teacher judgment and practice in the age of artificial intelligence. Southern African Review of Education, 25(1), 70-88.
Bearman, M., Ryan, J., & Ajjawi, R. (2023). Discourses of artificial intelligence in higher education: A critical literature review. Higher Education, 86, 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00937-2
Bissell, A. N. (2011). OER and open licenses: the dual-pub solution. Monterey Institute for Technology and Education. https://www.oerknowledgecloud.org/archive/59893035-OER-and-Open-Licenses-Dual-Pub-Solution.pdfB
Bolland, S. (2016, June 30). Neuroscience, AI, and the future of education [Video]. TED. https://youtu.be/_cYIvfS-knA
Boyle, S. (2023, June 29). ‘Artificial enough’ Dolly Parton fears she will be ‘grounded here forever’ if she is recreated using AI after her death. The U.S. Sun. https://www.the-sun.com/entertainment/8489578/dolly-parton-grounded-recreated-using-ai-technology-death/
Chaka, C. (2022). Digital marginalization, data marginalization, and algorithmic exclusions: a critical southern decolonial approach to datafication, algorithms, and digital citizenship from the Souths. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 18(3), 83-95. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135678
Colvard, N. B., Watson, C. E., & Park, H. (2018). The impact of open educational resources on various student success metrics. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 30(2), 262-276.
Darby, F. (2023, June 27). 4 steps to help plan for ChatGPT in your classroom. Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/4-steps-to-help-you-plan-for-chatgpt-in-your-classroom?utm_source=Iterable&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=campaign_7250459_nl_Your-Career_date_20230717&cid=yc&source=ams&sourceid=
Dawson, S., Jovanovic, J., Gasevic, D., & Pardo, A. (2017). From prediction to impact: Evaluation of a learning analytics retention program. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference (pp. 474-478). https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3027405
du Boulay, B. (2016). Artificial intelligence as an effective classroom assistant. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 31(6), 76-81.
Dunbar, R. L., Dingel, M. J., & Prat-Resina, X. (2014). Connecting analytics and curriculum design: Process and outcomes of building a tool to browse data relevant to course designers. Journal of Learning Analytics, 1(3), 223-243.
Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2023). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846
Frazier, A. (2022). Using learning analytics to assess student success in community college open educational resource biology courses. In E. Langran (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 711-718). San Diego, CA, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Gozalo-Brizuela, R. & Garrido-Merchán, E. C. (2023). ChatGPT is not all you need. A state of the art review of large generative AI models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.04655
Hooda, M., Rana, C., Dahiya, O., Rizwan, A., & Hossain, M. S. (2022). Artificial intelligence for assessment and feedback to enhance student success in higher education. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5215722
Hrastinski, S., Olofsson, A. D., Arkenback, C., Ekstrom, S., Ericsson, E., Fransson, G., Jaldemark, J., Ryberg, T., Oberg, L. M., Fuentes, A., Gustafsson, U., Humble, N., Mozelius, P., Sundgren, M., & Utterberg, M. (2019). Critical imaginaries and reflections on artificial intelligence and robots in postdigital K-12 education. Postdigital Science and Education, 1, 427-445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00046-x
Istenic, A., Bratko, I., & Rosanda, V. (2021). Pre-service teachers’ concerns about social robots in the classroom: A model for development. Education and Self Development, 16(2), 60-87.
Karumbaiah, S. & Brooks, J. (2021). How colonial continuities underlie algorithmic injustices in education. 2021 Conference on Research in Equitable and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology. (pp. 1-6). doi:10.1109/RESPECT51740.2021.9620605.
Kim, N. J. & Kim, M. K. (2022). Teacher’s perceptions of using an artificial intelligence-based educational tool for scientific writing. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.755914
Korn, J. (2023, February 22). Vanderbilt University apologizes for using ChatGPT to write mass-shooting email. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/22/tech/vanderbilt-chatgpt-shooting-email/index.html
Kwet, M. (2019). Digital colonialism: US empire and the new imperialism in the Global South. Race & Class, 60(4), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/030639681882317
Lin, C. H., Yu, C. C., Shih, P. K., & Wu, L. Y. (2021). STEM-based artificial intelligence learning in general education for non-engineering undergraduate students. Educational Technology & Society, 24(3), 224–237.
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed. An argument for AI in education. Pearson. https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/edu.google.com/en//pdfs/Intelligence-Unleashed-Publication.pdf
Majchrzak, A. & Markus, M. L. (2012). Technology affordances and constraints in management information systems (MIS). In Kessler, E. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Management Theory. SAGE Publications.
Manoylov, K., Mutiti, C., & White, K. (2018). Introduction to Environmental Science [2018 edition] Georgia College: Georgia’s Public Liberal Arts University. http://libguides.gcsu.edu/ensc1000/introduction
McMurtrie, B. (2023, March 16). Teaching: What you need to know about ChatGPT. Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/newsletter/teaching/2023-03-16
Memarian, B. & Doleck, T. (2023). Fairness, accountability, transparency, and ethics (FATE) in artificial intelligence (AI) and higher education: A systematic review. Computers and Education, 5, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100152
Mershad, K. & Wakim, P. (2018). A learning management system enhanced with internet of things applications. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(3), 23–40. http://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n3p23
Mohamed, S., Png, M. T., & Isaac, W. (2020). Decolonial AI: Decolonial theory as sociotechnical foresight in artificial intelligence. Philosophy and Technology, 33, 659-684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00405-8
Nazari, N., Shabbir, M. S., & Setiawan, R. (2021). Application of artificial intelligence powered digital writing assistant in higher education: randomized controlled trial. Heliyon, 7(5), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07014
Pawlowski, J. M. & Bick, M. (2012). Open educational resources. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 4, 209–212. doi:10.1007/s11576-012-0326-2
Petrides, L., Levin, D., & Watson, C. E. (2018). Toward a sustainable OER ecosystem: The case for OER stewardship. The Care Framework. https://www.careframework.org/?page_id=48
Roche, C., Wall, P. J., & Lewis, D. (2022). Ethics and diversity in artificial intelligence policies, strategies and initiatives. AI and Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00218-9
Roll, I. & Wylie, R. (2016). Evolution and revolution in artificial intelligience in education. International Journal of Artifical Intelligence in Education, 26, 582-599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0110-3
Saakal, P. (2023, June 22). ChatGPT should pay to use media content, says opposition. The Sydney Morning Herald. https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/chatgpt-should-pay-to-use-media-content-says-opposition-20230621-p5dibc.html
Statewide Educational Technology Plan, Louisiana Stat. 17 § 3921.2 (2014 & rev. 2015). http://legis.la.gov/legis/Law.aspx?d=80949
Takahashi, D. (2023, April 5). Metaphysic CEO files for copyright of his own AI likeness. VentureBeat. https://venturebeat.com/ai/metaphysic-ceo-files-for-copyright-of-his-own-ai-likeness/
Urging and requesting the Joint Legislative Committee on Technology and Cybersecurity to study the impact of artificial intelligence on operations, procurement, and policy, S. Con. Res. 49. (2023). http://legis.la.gov/Legis/BillInfo.aspx?s=23RS&b=SCR49&sbi=y
VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.611369
Wehrli, S., Hertweck, C., Amirian, M., Glüge, S., & Stadelmann, T. (2022). Bias, awareness, and ignorance in deep-learning-based face recognition. AI and Ethics, 2, 509-522.
White, A. (2023, June 21). Samuel L. Jackson talks AI, use of likeness “in perpetuity” in contracts: “I cross that s*** out.” The Hollywood Reporter. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-news/secret-invasion-samuel-l-jackson-ai-use-of-likeness-1235520948/
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marin, V. I., Bond, M. & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(39), 1-27.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Research Issues in Contemporary Education (RICE) is a nationally indexed, double-blind, peer-reviewed online journal that publishes educational research studies, literature reviews, theoretical manuscripts, and practitioner-oriented articles regarding issues in education. Views expressed in all published articles are the views of the author(s), and publication in RICE does not constitute endorsement. Submission of an article implies that it has not been published and is not currently under review for publication elsewhere.
RICE is an online journal available in the public domain, and use of its content is protected by a Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. This license provides authors with an assurance that LERA values their rights to their scholarly works and has adopted this license to restrict use of RICE content without appropriate permission and attribution.