A Quantitative Study of Schools as Learning Organizations: An Examination of Professional Learning Communities, Teacher Self-Efficacy, and Collective Efficacy
Keywords:
professional learning communities, learning communities, teacher self-efficacy, collective efficacy, high poverty schoolsAbstract
This quantitative study explored teacher perceptions of professional learning community dimensions, teacher self-efficacy, and collective efficacy. Professional learning communities (PLCs) have been shown to positively impact teacher self-efficacy and collective efficacy, all supporting student achievement. The overarching question guiding this study was, What relationships exist among professional learning community dimensions, teacher self-efficacy, and collective efficacy and what differences exist in teacher perceptions in elementary, middle, and high schools; TAP and Non-TAP schools; and high poverty and low poverty schools? The study sample included 57 schools within one large metropolitan southern school district. Three data collection measures were utilized to assess teacher perceptions including the Professional Learning Community Assessment-Revised, the Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale, and the Teacher Efficacy Beliefs Scale-Collective Form. Data analyses included descriptive and inferential statistics and resulted in eight major findings with finding Implications related to conceptual/theoretical frameworks, leadership and practice, and future research. These findings support professional learning communities as positively influencing teacher self-efficacy and collective efficacy; PLCs as contributing to school improvement; and school variables, such as poverty level, PLC implementation, and school level indeed influence efficacy. Additionally, study findings inform district leaders, school leaders, and teachers regarding implementation of PLC practices in enhancing teacher self-efficacy and collective efficacy and supporting school improvement.
References
Adams, C. M., & Forsyth, P. B. (2006). Proximate sources of collective teacher efficacy. Journal of Educational Administration, 44(6), 625-642. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230610704828
Almy, S., & Theokas, C. (2010). Not prepared for class: High-poverty schools continue to have fewer in-field teachers. Education Trust. https://edtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Not-Prepared-for-Class.pdf
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control: W.H. Freeman.
Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75-78.
Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. (1977). Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change, Vol. VII: Factors Affecting Implementation and Continuation. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED140432.pdf:
Berry, B., Johnson, D., & Montgomery, D. (2005). The power of teacher leadership. Educational Leadership, 62(5), 56-60.
Borg, J. R., Borg, M. O., & Stranahan, H. A. (2012). Closing the achievement gap between high-poverty schools and low-poverty schools. Research in Business and Economics Journal, 5, 1.
Boyd, D., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., Ronfeldt, M., & Wyckoff, J. (2011). The effect of school neighborhoods on teachers’ career decisions. Whither Opportunity, 377-396.
Bruce, C. D., Esmonde, I., Ross, J., Dookie, L., & Beatty, R. (2010). The effects of sustained classroom-embedded teacher professional learning on teacher efficacy and related student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1598-1608. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.011
Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. (2005). Who teaches whom? Race and the distribution of novice teachers. Economics of Education review, 24(4), 377-392.
Corporation, B. (2012). STEM Education, Science Literacy, and the Innovation Workforce in America: 2012 Analysis and Insights from the Bayer Facts of Science Education Survey. Retrieved from http://www.se.edu/dept/native-american-center/files/2012/04/STEM-Education-Science-Literacy-and-the-Innovation-Workforce-in-America.pdf
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative: Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement. Education policy analysis archives, 8, 1.
Devos, G., Tuytens, M., & Hulpia, H. (2013). Teachers’ organizational commitment: Examining the mediating effects of distributed leadership. American Journal of Education, 120(2), 205-231.
Dufour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R. E., & Many, T. W. (2016). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work. Solution Tree Press.
Dufour, R., & Eaker, R. E. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Solution Tree Press.
Eckert, J. (2010). Performance-based compensation: Design and implementation at six teacher incentive fund sites. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Último acceso en julio, 25, 2011.
Eckert, J. (2013). Increasing educator effectiveness: Lessons learned from teacher incentive fund sites. National Institute for Excellence in Teaching.
ESSA. (2015). Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 , Pub. L No. 114 Stat. 1177 (2015-2016).
Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. (2004). Collective efficacy beliefs: Theoretical developments, empirical evidence, and future directions. Educational Researcher, 33(3), 3-13.
Goddard, R. D., LoGerfo, L., & Hoy, W. K. (2004). High school accountability: The role of perceived collective efficacy. Educational Policy, 18(3), 403-425.
Goddard, R. D., & Skrla, L. (2006). The influence of school social composition on teachers’ collective efficacy beliefs. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(2), 216-235.
Goldhaber, D., Lavery, L., & Theobald, R. (2015). Uneven playing field? Assessing the teacher quality gap between advantaged and disadvantaged students. Educational Researcher, 44(5), 293-307.
Gordon, R., Kane, T. J., Staiger, D. O., & Rubin, R. E. (2008). Identifying effective teachers using performance on the job. In Path to Prosperity (pp. 189-226): Brookings Institution Press.
Guo, Y., Connor, C. M., Yang, Y., Roehrig, A. D., & Morrison, F. J. (2012). The effects of teacher qualification, teacher self-efficacy, and classroom practices on fifth graders' literacy outcomes. The Elementary School Journal, 113(1), 3-24.
Guskey, T. R., & Passaro, P. D. (1994). Teacher efficacy: A study of construct dimensions. American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 627-643. doi:10.2307/1163230
Hipp, K. K., & Huffman, J. B. (2010). Demystifying professional learning communities: School leadership at its best. Rowman & Littlefield Education.
Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Retrieved from http://www.sedl.org/pubs/change34/plc-cha34.pdf
Huffman, J. B., & Hipp, K. K. (2003). Reculturing schools as professional learning communities. Scarecrow Education.
Jerald, C. D., & Van Hook, K. (2011). More than measurement: The TAP system's lessons learned for designing better teacher evaluation systems. National Institute for Excellence in Teaching.
Kalogrides, D., & Loeb, S. (2013). Different teachers, different peers: The magnitude of student sorting within schools. Educational Researcher, 42(6), 304-316.
Louis, K. S., & Kruse, S. D. (1995). Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Louis, K. S., & Marks, H. M. (1998). Does professional community affect the classroom? Teachers' work and student experiences in restructuring schools. American Journal of Education, 106(4), 532-575.
Mojavezi, A., & Tamiz, M. P. (2012). The impact of teacher self-efficacy on the students' motivation and achievement. Theory & Practice In Language Studies, 2(3).
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, C. o. C. S. S. Common Core State Standards Initiative.
National Institute for Excellence in Teaching. (2012). Beyond "Job-Embedded": Ensuring that good professional development gets results. Retrieved from https://ezproxyprod.ucs.louisiana.edu:2443/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED533379&site=ehost-live
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, P.L. 107-110, 20 U.S.C § 6319 (2002).
Olivier, D. F. (2001). Teacher personal and school culture characteristics in effective schools: Toward a model of a professional learning community. Unpublished dissertation. Louisiana State University.
Olivier, D. F., & Hipp, K. K. (2006). Leadership capacity and collective efficacy: Interacting to sustain student learning in a professional learning community. Journal of School Leadership, 16(5), 505-519.
Olivier, D. F., & Hipp, K. K. (2010). Assessing and analyzing schools as professional learning communities. In K. K. Hipp & J. B. Huffman (Eds.), Demystifying professional learning communities: School leadership at its best (pp. 29-41). Rowman & Littlefield Education.
Orfield, G., & Lee, C. (2005). Why segregation matters: Poverty and educational inequality. The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University. https://civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/research/k-12-education/integration-and-diversity/why-segregation-matters-poverty-and-educational-inequality/orfield-why-segregation-matters-2005.pdf
Ozer, E. M., & Bandura, A. (1990). Mechanisms governing empowerment effects: A self-efficacy analysis. J Pers Soc Psychol, 58(3), 472-486.
Phillips, J. (2003). Powerful learning: Creating learning communities in urban school reform. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 18(3), 240-258.
Porter, A., McMaken, J., Hwang, J., & Yang, R. (2011). Common core standards: The new US intended curriculum. Educational Researcher, 40(3), 103-116.
Reardon, S. F. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: New evidence and possible explanations. Whither opportunity, 91-116.
Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417-458.
Schwartz, H. L. (2010). Housing policy is school policy: Economically integrative housing promotes academic success in Montgomery County, MD. The Education Digest, 76(6), 42.
Strahan, D. (2003). Promoting a collaborative professional culture in three elementary schools that have beaten the odds. The Elementary School Journal, 104(2), 127-146.
Stronge, J. H., Ward, T. J., & Grant, L. W. (2011). What makes good teachers good? A cross-case analysis of the connection between teacher effectiveness and student achievement. Journal of teacher Education, 62(4), 339-355.
Swanson, P. (2014). The power of belief: Spanish teachers' sense of efficacy and student performance on the National Spanish Examinations. Hispania, 5-20.
Swars, S. L., & Chestnutt, C. (2015). A mixed methods study of elementary teachers' experiences with and perspectives on the CCSS-Mathematics. North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Barr, M. (2004). Fostering student learning: The relationship of collective teacher efficacy and student achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3(3), 189-209.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783-805.
Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher Efficacy: Its Meaning and Measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202-248. doi:10.2307/1170754
Tschannen-Moran, M., & McMaster, P. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy: Four professional development formats and their relationship to self-efficacy and implementation of a new teaching strategy. The Elementary School Journal, 110(2), 228-245.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2018a). Concentration of Public School Students Eligible for Free or Reduced-Price Lunch. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_clb.asp#f2
National Center for Education Statistics. (2018b). Mathematics Performance. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cnc.asp
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Service. (2016). Prevalence of Teachers Without Full State Certification and Variation Across Schools and States. http://www.ed.gov/offices/opepd/ppss/reports.html#tq.
Voelkel Jr, R. H., & Chrispeels, J. H. (2017). Understanding the link between professional learning communities and teacher collective efficacy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 28(4), 505-526.
Williams, D. J. (2013). Urban education and professional learning communities. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 79(2), 31.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Research Issues in Contemporary Education (RICE) is a nationally indexed, double-blind, peer-reviewed online journal that publishes educational research studies, literature reviews, theoretical manuscripts, and practitioner-oriented articles regarding issues in education. Views expressed in all published articles are the views of the author(s), and publication in RICE does not constitute endorsement. Submission of an article implies that it has not been published and is not currently under review for publication elsewhere.
RICE is an online journal available in the public domain, and use of its content is protected by a Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. This license provides authors with an assurance that LERA values their rights to their scholarly works and has adopted this license to restrict use of RICE content without appropriate permission and attribution.