Exploring Race Issues at the Turn of the 20th Century Using Historical Empathy: A Qualitative Study
Keywords:
historical empathy, perspective recognition, contextualization, counter-narratives, historical dialoguesAbstract
Social studies teachers have to create an environment where students are empowered to discuss contemporary issues, such as racism and social injustice. This means they are provided activities that allow them to develop historical empathy skills: perspective recognition, contextualization, and using evidence to make informed decisions. In this article, the researcher conducted a qualitative study in an 11th grade U. S. history class in an urban high school. As a part of the study, an eight-day unit was implemented about the experiences of African Americans in the United States at the turn of the 20th century. Students analyzed counter-narratives in order to understand how racist policies and attitudes of the early 20th century impacted African Americans and how certain enduring issues, such as racism, have roots in the past. Data were collected from coding students’ completed document analysis sheets, first-person perspective narratives, and historical dialogues. Findings indicated that students benefitted from activities that foster students’ historical empathy skills, as they were able to connect affectively and cognitively with historical figures. This study presents the importance of including culturally responsive curriculum in the 21st century social studies classroom.
References
Author. (2016).
Author. (2017).
Banks, J. A. (2016). Cultural diversity and education: Foundations, curriculum, and teaching. Routledge.
Barton, B. C., & Levstik, L. S. (2004). Teaching history for the common good. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Brooks, S. (2008). Displaying historical empathy: What impact can a writing assignment have? Social Studies Research and Practice, 3(2), 130-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/SSRP-02-2008-B0008
Brooks, S. (2009). Historical empathy in the social studies classroom: A review of the literature. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 33(2), 213-234.
Brooks, S. (2013). Teaching for historical understanding in the advanced placement program: a case study. The History Teacher, 47(1), 61-76.
Brooks, S. (2014). Connecting the past to the present in the middle-level classroom: A comparative case study. Theory & Research in Social Education, 42(1), 65-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2013.860068
Clabough, J., Turner, T., & Carano, K. (2017). When the lion roars everyone listens: Scary good middle school social studies. Association for Middle Level Education.
Clabough J., Turner, T. N., Russell, III, W. B., & Waters, S. (2016). Unpuzzling history with primary sources. Information Age Publishing.
Colby, S. C. (2008). Energizing the history classroom: Historical narrative inquiry and historical empathy. Social Studies Research and Practice, 3(3), 60-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/SSRP-03-2008-B0005
Colby, S. R. (2009). Contextualization and historical empathy: Seventh-graders’ interpretation of primary documents. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 12(1/2), 69-83.
Creswell, J. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
Davis, Jr., O. L. (2001). In pursuit of historical empathy. In O. L., Davis, E. A. Yeager, & S. J. Foster (Eds.), Historical empathy and perspective taking in the social studies (pp. 1-12). Rowman & Littlefield.
Davison, M. (2017). Teaching about the first world war today: Historical empathy and participatory citizenship. Citizenship, Social and Economics Education, 16(3), 148-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2047173417736906
Edwards, L. F. (2007). Status without rights: African Americans and the tangled history of law and governance in the nineteenth-century U. S. south. The American Historical Review, 112(2), 365-393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/ahr.112.2.365
Endacott, J. L. (2010). Reconsidering affective engagement in historical empathy. Theory & Research in Social Education, 38(1), 6-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2010.10473415
Endacott, J. L. (2011). Power and liberty: A long-term course planning strategy to encourage the contextualization of events in American history. The Social Studies, 102(2), 73-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2010.489075
Endacott, J. L. (2014). Negotiating the process of historical empathy. Theory and Research in Social Education, 42(1), 4-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2013.826158
Endacott, J., & Brooks, S. (2013). An updated theoretical practical model for promoting historical empathy. Social Studies Research and Practice, 8(1), 41-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/SSRP-01-2013-B0003
Endacott, J. L., & Pelekanos, C. (2015). Slaves, women, and war! Engaging middle school students in historical empathy for enduring understanding. The Social Studies, 106(1), 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2014.957378
Evans, R. W. (1996). A critical approach to teaching United States history. In R. W. Evans & D. W. Saxe (Eds.), Handbook on teaching social issues: NCSS bulletin 93 (pp. 152-160). National Council for the Social Studies.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). Herder and Herder.
Gates, L., Jr. (2019). Stony the road: Reconstruction, White supremacy, and the rise of Jim Crow. Penguin Books.
Grant, S. G. (2013). From inquiry arc to instructional practice: The potential of the C3 Framework. Social Education, 77(6), 322-326.
Hawkman, A. (2017). Race and racism in the social studies: Foundations of critical race theory. In P. T. Turner & T. S. Hawley (Eds.), Race lessons: Using inquiring to teach about race in social studies (pp. 19-32). Information Age Publishing.
Hawley, T. S., Hostetler, A. L., & Chandler, P. T. (2017). Teaching the Montgomery bus boycott as citizen action for racial and economic justice. In P. T. Turner & T. S. Hawley (Eds.), Race lessons: Using inquiring to teach about race in social studies (pp. 155-169). Information Age Publishing.
Hess, D. E. (2011). Discussions that drive democracy: Schools are ideal sites for preparing students to honor diverse viewpoints. Educational Leadership, 69(1), 69-73.
Huijgen, T., Holthuis, P., Van Boxtel, C., Van de Grift, W., & Suhre, C. (2019). Students’ historical contextualization and the cold war. British Journal of Educational Studies, 67(4), 449-468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2018.1518512
Inwood, J. F. (2011). Geographies of race in the American south: The continuing legacies of Jim Crow segregation. Southeastern Geographer, 51(4), 564-577. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/sgo.2011.0033
Journell, W. (2016). Teaching social issues in the social studies classroom. In W. Journell (Ed.), Teaching social studies in an era of divisiveness: The challenges of discussing social issues in a non-partisan way (pp. 1-12). Rowman & Littlefield.
Keegan, P. (2021). Critical affective civic literacy: A framework for attending to political emotion in the social studies classroom. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 45(1), 15-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2020.06.003
Kelly, B. L. (2010). Right to ride: Streetcar boycotts and African American citizenship in the era of Plessy v. Ferguson. The University of North Carolina Press Chapel Hill.
Kendi, I. X. (2016). Stamped from the beginning: The definitive history of racist ideas in America. Bold Type Books.
King, L. J. (2014). When lions write history: Black history textbooks, African-American educators, & the alternative Black curriculum in social studies education, 1890-1940. Multicultural Education, 22(1), 2-11.
King, L. J. (2015). “A narrative to the colored children in America”: Lelia Amos Pendleton, African American history textbooks, and challenging personhood. The Journal of Negro Education, 84(4), 519-533.
Kucan, L., Cho, B., & Han, H. (2017). Introducing the historical thinking practice of contextualizing to middle school students. The Social Studies, 108(5), 210-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2017.1359483
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995a). But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 159-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405849509543675
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995b). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465-491. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465
Ledesma, M. C., & Calderon, D. (2015). Critical race theory in education: A review of past literature and a look to the future. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(3), 206-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077800414557825
Lee, P., & Ashby, R. (2001). Empathy, perspective taking, ad rational understanding. In O. L. Davis, E. A. Yeager, & S. J. Foster (Eds.), Historical empathy and perspective taking in the social studies (pp. 21-50). Rowman & Littlefield.
Lee, P., & Shemilt, D. (2011). The concept that dares not speak its name: Should empathy come out of the closet? Teaching History, 143, 39-49.
Levstik, L. S., & Barton K. C. (2015). Doing history: Investigating with children in elementary and middle schools (5th ed.). Routledge.
Logan, R. W. (1997). The betrayal of the negro: From Rutherford B. Hayes to Woodrow Wilson. Da Capo Press.
Metro, R. (2017). Teaching U. S. history thematically: Document-based lessons for the secondary classroom. Teachers College Press.
Miller, R., Liu, K., & Ball, A. F. (2020). Critical counter-narrative as transformative methodology for educational equity. Review of Research in Education, 44, 269-300.
Milner, R. H., Howard, T. C. (2013). Counter-narrative as a method: Race, policy and research for teacher education. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16(4), 536-561. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20908501
Moore, J. M. (2003). Booker T. Washington, W. E. B. Du Bois, and the struggle for racial uplift. Scholarly Resources, Inc.
Monte-Sano, C., & Harris, K. (2012). Recitation and reasoning in novice history teachers’ use of writing. The Elementary School Journal, 113(1), 105-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/666388
NCSS. (2013a). The College, Career, and Civic Life (C3) Framework for Social Studies State Standards: Guidance for enhancing the rigor of K-12 civics, economics, geography, and history. Author.
NCSS. (2013b, May 1). Revitalizing civic learning in our schools. National Council for the Social Studies. https://www.socialstudies.org/positions/revitalizing_civic_learning
NCSS. (2020, March 10). President’s message: NCSS’s position on an inclusive curriculum. National Council for the Social Studies. https://www.socialstudies.org/presidents-message/presidents-message-ncsss-position-inclusive-curriculum
Nokes, J. D. (2013). Building students’ historical literacies: Learning to read and reason with historical texts and evidence. Routledge.
Norrell, R. J. (2009). Up from slavery: The life of Booker T. Washington. Belknap Press.
Ochoa-Becker, A. S. (1996). Building a rationale for issues-centered education. In R. W. Evans & D. W. Saxe (Eds.), Handbook on teaching social issues: NCSS bulletin 93 (pp. 6-13). National Council for the Social Studies.
Perrotta K. A., & Bohan, C. H. (2017). More than a feeling: Tracing the progressive era origins of historical empathy in the social curriculum, 1890-1940s. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 42(1), 27-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2017.01.002
Reisman, A., & Wineburg, S. (2008). Teaching the skill of contextualizing in history. The Social Studies, 99(5), 202-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/TSSS.99.5.202-207
Roberts, S. L. (2016). Keep ‘em guessing: Using student predictions to inform historical understanding and empathy. Social Studies Research and Practice, 11(3), 45-50.
Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.
Sánchez, J. G., & Sáenz, R. Y. (2017). Stories, counterstories, and tales of resistance. In P. T. Turner & T. S. Hawley (Eds.), Race lessons: Using inquiring to teach about race in social studies (pp. 213-230). Information Age Publishing.
Stewart, W. J. (1991). Optimizing learning in the urban school. American Secondary Education, 19(4), 12-17.
Swan, K., & Griffin, S. (2013). Beating the odds: The College, Career, and Civic Life (C3) Framework for Social Studies State Standards. Social Education, 77(6), 317-321.
Thomas, E., & Magilvy, J. K. (2011). Qualitative rigor or research validity in qualitative research. Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, 16(1), 151-155.
Turner, T., & Clabough, J. (2015). Dramatic social studies monologues to stir the gifted soul. Teaching for High Potential, 14-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6155.2011.00283.x
VanSledright, B. A. (2004). What does it mean to think historically…and how do you teach it? Social Education, 68(3), 230-234.
Willis, A. I., & Lewis, K. C. (1998). Focus on research: A conversation with Gloria Ladson-Billings. Language Arts, 75(1), 61-70.
Wineburg, S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Chartering the future of teaching the past. Temple University Press.
Wineburg, S., Martin, D., & Monte-Sano, C. (2013). Reading like a historian: Teaching literacy in middle & high school history classrooms. Teachers College Press.
Woodson, A. N. (2015). “There ain’t no White people here”: Master narratives of the civil rights movement in the stories of urban youth. Urban Education, 52(3), 316-342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0042085915602543
Woodson, A. N. (2016). We’re just ordinary people: Messianic master narratives and black youths’ civic agency. Theory & Research in Social Education, 44(2), 184-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2016.1170645
Woodward, C. V. (1971). Origins of the new south 1877-1913. Louisiana State University Press.
Yeager, E. A., & Doppen, F. H. (2001). Teaching and learning multiple perspectives on the use of the atomic bomb: Historical empathy in the secondary classroom. In O. L., Davis, E. A. Yeager, & S. J. Foster (Eds.), Historical empathy and perspective taking in the social studies (pp. 97-114). Rowman & Littlefield.
Yeager, E. A., & Foster, S. J. (2001). The role of empathy in developing historical understanding. In O. L., Davis, E. A. Yeager, & S. J. Foster (Eds.), Historical empathy and perspective taking in the social studies (pp. 21-50). Rowman & Littlefield.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Research Issues in Contemporary Education (RICE) is a nationally indexed, double-blind, peer-reviewed online journal that publishes educational research studies, literature reviews, theoretical manuscripts, and practitioner-oriented articles regarding issues in education. Views expressed in all published articles are the views of the author(s), and publication in RICE does not constitute endorsement. Submission of an article implies that it has not been published and is not currently under review for publication elsewhere.
RICE is an online journal available in the public domain, and use of its content is protected by a Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. This license provides authors with an assurance that LERA values their rights to their scholarly works and has adopted this license to restrict use of RICE content without appropriate permission and attribution.